Skip to main content
18+ · Research for adults. No gambling is offered on this website.
All insights
Market guide11 minute read

Denmark licensed gambling operators: check the official register

Check Danish gambling licences by entity, domain, product and current status, including revoked licences, blocked sites and regulator enforcement records.

Published 12 August 2026 · Updated 8 November 2026
By iGaming Atlas Research Desk12 primary sourcesReview cadence: 30 days
Denmark licensed gambling operators: check the official register. Entity + domain + product + status: Current status prevents a revoked licence from surviving as a false positive.
Jump to a section

The short answer

  • A Danish licence check begins with the Danish Gambling Authority record, not with whether an international gambling website loads in Denmark.
  • The strongest match joins four separate fields: Denmark as the jurisdiction, the licence-holding entity, the consumer domain and the permitted product.
  • A directory row is only one evidence layer: on 21 August 2026 the Authority confirmed that Jackpotbet A/S was bankrupt and that its betting and online-casino licences had been revoked.
  • Licence, supervision and illegal-market records answer different questions. A reprimand does not cancel a licence, while a DNS-blocked domain is not a licensed-operator record.
  • A record for Denmark is not evidence of permission in another country, even when the same brand appears elsewhere.
  • B2B game supply requires its own evidence check; a customer operator's Danish licence is not a substitute for a supplier licence.

Danish licence records and one material status change

Illustrative records from the 11-relationship Atlas baseline. Bet365, Betsson and PokerStars retain their 6 November 2026 holder checks; Unibet was rechecked on 8 November. The 888 record discussed below was also rechecked on 8 November. Jackpotbet is a separate historical example. This is not a directory census; the master page still displays a publisher update of 20 August 2026.

Consumer brand
Bet365
Licence holder
Hillside (New Media Malta) Plc
Named Danish domain
bet365.dk
Current evidence
Online casino and betting
Consumer brand
Betsson / NordicBet
Licence holder
Nordic Spil Limited
Named Danish domain
betsson.dk; nordicbet.dk
Current evidence
Online casino and betting
Consumer brand
PokerStars
Licence holder
Reel Denmark Limited
Named Danish domain
betstars.dk; pokerstars.dk; pokerstarscasino.dk; pokerstarssports.dk
Current evidence
Online casino and betting
Consumer brand
Unibet
Licence holder
Unibet (Denmark) Limited
Named Danish domain
unibet.dk; mariacasino.dk
Current evidence
Online casino and betting
Consumer brand
Jackpotbet
Licence holder
Jackpotbet A/S
Named Danish domain
jackpotbet.dk
Current evidence
Former online casino and betting licences; revoked after bankruptcy

Brand, entity, domain, product and current status remain separate fields. The Jackpotbet row is historical evidence and must not be counted as a current licence or live operator.

The short answer: use the Danish Gambling Authority record

Denmark's gambling regulator is Spillemyndigheden, the Danish Gambling Authority. Its licensing material says that online casino games offered to players in Denmark require a licence, and it publishes licence-holder records that can identify the operating company, named domain and permitted activity. The directory is the starting point, but a newer revocation, bankruptcy or enforcement notice can change how an older row must be read.

A search result, an advert or an accessible .com site is weaker evidence. It may show that a brand is visible, but it does not establish that a particular company may offer a particular product to Danish players. Atlas therefore treats Denmark, the licence-holding entity, the exact consumer domain and the product category as four separate checks.

Evidence path

From question to defensible conclusion

1

The short answer: use the Danish Gambling Authority record

2

What counts as online casino in Denmark

3

The four-part Danish licence check

4

Why the legal entity is not the same as the brand

Each step must preserve the jurisdiction, product, entity, source and review date.

What counts as online casino in Denmark

The Authority's online-casino guidance describes roulette, blackjack, baccarat, punto banco, poker, online bingo, gaming machines and combination games as examples within the licensed activity. Betting is a separate permission category in the operator records. A page that proves betting should therefore not be stretched into proof of online casino, poker or any other product that is not named.

This distinction matters when a consumer-facing brand has a broad international catalogue. The relevant question is not what the group promotes globally; it is what the Danish regulator has recorded for the named entity and Danish domain.

The four-part Danish licence check

First set the jurisdiction to Denmark and the product you need to assess. Then open the current Danish Gambling Authority licence-holder record and capture the company name exactly as published. Next compare the record's domain with the site in question, including country-code variations. Finally read the activity field rather than relying on a brand label or an old press release.

The result should be written narrowly. For example: a named Danish record for a named legal entity and bet365.dk can support a finding about the activities shown on that record. It does not by itself establish a licence for another Bet365 domain, a related company or a different jurisdiction.

  • Name the jurisdiction and product before searching.
  • Match the legal entity exactly, including punctuation and corporate suffixes.
  • Check that the consumer domain in the record is the domain being assessed.
  • Read the recorded activity and any current status notice.
  • Save the official URL and verification date with the conclusion.

Why the legal entity is not the same as the brand

Bet365, Betsson and PokerStars are useful examples because their public-facing brands are not the legal names in the Danish records. The Authority identifies Hillside (New Media Malta) Plc for bet365.dk, Nordic Spil Limited for betsson.dk and nordicbet.dk, and Reel Denmark Limited for the PokerStars domains it lists. A brand search that ignores these entity names can miss the strongest available evidence.

Keep that legal entity alongside each exact domain and activity. A shared brand or corporate parent does not fill a missing field in the official record; report the unmatched relationship rather than borrowing another company's evidence.

The bounded 8 November check covered two individual records: 888 Denmark Limited lists 888.dk, 888casino.dk, 888poker.dk and 888sport.dk; Unibet (Denmark) Limited lists mariacasino.dk and unibet.dk. Each record names online casino and betting and says No under Licensed in Greenland. These are Danish entity-domain-category findings, not evidence of Greenland permission or confirmation that every listed domain offers every game included in the broad online-casino licence category.

Why an exact domain is a separate evidence field

A regulator record can name the domain through which a licence is used. This is especially helpful where a group operates several country sites or has historical domains. Nordic Spil Limited's Danish record, for example, names both betsson.dk and nordicbet.dk; Reel Denmark Limited's record names several PokerStars-related domains. Those entries should be read as domain-specific evidence rather than general permission for every similarly branded website.

If the exact site does not appear in the current record, Atlas does not infer a match from visual branding alone. It is safer to report that the domain has not yet been matched than to convert a neighbouring domain into proof.

The Jackpotbet record moved from reconstruction to revocation

The regulator's 7 May notice said Jackpotbet A/S had entered reconstruction on 22 April and that jackpotbet.dk was out of operation. The position then changed materially. On 21 August the Authority announced that the company had been declared bankrupt on 18 June and that its Danish online-casino and betting licences had been revoked.

The later notice now controls the current-status conclusion. The old record remains useful for history, entity and domain matching, but it is no longer evidence of a live Danish licence. Players with funds are directed to the appointed trustee; the regulator does not promise a repayment amount or timetable.

Evidence summary

12

cited sources

Last content update: 2026-11-08.

Full review remains pending; see source dates and limitations below. Review target: every 30 days.

A Danish licence check begins with the Danish Gambling Authority record, not with whether an international gambling website loads in Denmark.

The strongest match joins four separate fields: Denmark as the jurisdiction, the licence-holding entity, the consumer domain and the permitted product.

A directory row is only one evidence layer: on 21 August 2026 the Authority confirmed that Jackpotbet A/S was bankrupt and that its betting and online-casino licences had been revoked.

The visual summary does not replace the linked regulator records below.

Licensed, supervised, revoked and blocked are different findings

A current licence says the named entity may offer the named product through the recorded domain. A reprimand or police referral belongs to supervisory history and does not by itself prove that the licence has ended. Revocation is different again: it changes the licence status, as the Jackpotbet notice expressly confirms.

A DNS-blocking order sits on the illegal-market side of the evidence model. On 19 August 2026 the Authority said a court had ordered 98 sites blocked, taking its cumulative total to 870 since 2012. Those are domains, not necessarily 870 companies, and they should not be mixed into the licensed-operator count.

How Denmark handles unlicensed online gambling

The Authority states that operators offering gambling such as casino, betting or poker in Denmark need a Danish Gambling Authority licence. Its 19 August 2026 blocking notice describes an initial request to stop, a court decision and ISP-level DNS blocking. That notice is a dated enforcement round, not a verified current total of all blocked domains.

A missing match is not automatically a finding about every activity or every company in a group. It means the reviewed source did not yet support the precise relationship being tested. Re-check the legal name, trading name, domain and product before drawing a conclusion.

Game suppliers need a separate check

An operator record does not establish a game supplier's permission. The Authority's current supplier guidance requires a supplier licence for businesses providing games to Danish betting and online-casino licensees. Its scope includes casino games and services that operate and settle bets, as well as combination games.

For a B2B supplier review, check the supplier's own official record separately from the customer operator's record. The guidance limits a supplier licence to supplying Danish-licensed operators and gives a maximum term of five years. Record the supplier entity, scope and term without treating the customer's licence or an integration announcement as the supplier's evidence.

A reproducible record for compliance teams and readers

For each check, record the jurisdiction, product, brand as displayed, regulator-published legal entity, exact domain, source URL and date. Add a separate operational-status field when the regulator has issued a notice. This makes the conclusion auditable and makes later updates much faster.

Atlas uses this method across its country and operator research. Start with the Denmark country profile, then compare the relevant operator profiles such as Bet365, Betsson and PokerStars. For a broader source map, use the worldwide regulator directory and the Atlas licence checker rather than relying on a single article.

Limits and next review

This guide is a dated research guide, not legal advice. It does not test account eligibility, geolocation, tax treatment, recovery from an insolvent operator or whether a site accepts a particular player. It also does not claim to be a complete list of every licence holder; operator records can change after new licences, surrenders, revocations, restructurings, domain changes or regulator updates.

Atlas will re-check this high-risk market guide within 30 days, and earlier if the Danish Gambling Authority changes a record or publishes a material enforcement or operator-status notice. Readers making a legal, compliance or commercial decision should open the linked official record immediately before acting.

Atlas rechecked all then-cited current pages on 6 November 2026 and removed a 2025 guidance-PDF citation that returned 404. Those checks support the retained Bet365, Betsson and PokerStars examples, supplier guidance and dated Jackpotbet and blocking notices. The master directory was reopened on 8 November, but its search results are not a complete captured census and its displayed publisher update remains 20 August 2026.

The 8 November update is limited to the master-directory page and the individual 888 Denmark Limited and Unibet (Denmark) Limited records. It does not recheck every other holder, retained citation or enforcement history. Those nine other cited pages keep their 6 November checks; the complete guide review remains dated 6 November and the next scheduled review remains 6 December 2026. This partial update does not restart that 30-day full-review cadence.

Turn the evidence into a focused research brief

Send the regulatory question, entities and markets you need reviewed. We can scope a private source review with dated evidence and explicit limits.

Markets, outputs, evidence cut-off and fee are agreed in the written scope.

Need structured records for a workflow? Explore CSV and JSON data.

Primary sources

These links are maintained by the named authority. Open the current source before relying on a status.

Continue in the Atlas

🇩🇰

Denmark

Spillemyndigheden

Regulated
11 of 11 selected operator relationships sourcedView
Bet365 logo

Bet365

Group or brand company: Bet365 Group Ltd

Sports bettingCasinoPoker
39 market recordsView profile
Betsson logo

Betsson

Group or brand company: Betsson AB

Sports bettingCasinoPoker
10 market recordsView profile
PokerStars logo

PokerStars

Group or brand company: Flutter Entertainment

PokerCasinoSports betting
16 market recordsView profile
Unibet logo

Unibet

Group or brand company: FDJ UNITED

Sports bettingCasinoPoker
14 market recordsView profile