Gibraltar gambling licence register: holders, brands and suppliers

For a Gibraltar licence check, start at the official Gambling Division register. The Government of Gibraltar's remote-gambling page points researchers to that register. Copy the named holder and its category before following an Approved Brands link; the register heading alone does not establish which company operates a particular website.

This guide is for research, compliance and supplier due diligence. It explains what can be recorded from the public source and where the evidence stops. It does not assess a gambling service, recommend an operator or certify access in another market.

The four sections use their own numbering. In the 11 November reading, they contain 29, one, 33 and five entries respectively. Their labels distinguish remote B2C, non-remote B2C, remote B2B and support services. B2C means business-to-consumer; B2B means business-to-business. Keep the section name attached to every row when collecting the evidence.

The first B2C remote entry illustrates why a row count needs a label: it names LC International Limited and ElectraWorks Limited together, followed by Entain Group in parentheses. Counting it as one company would discard a named holder; counting it as one brand would invent a brand population. A combined row needs further investigation when the task is to allocate a specific activity or website to a particular company.

The B2B remote section contains 28 entries labelled Gambling Services (B2B), two labelled Bookmaker (B2B) and three labelled Software Supplier (B2B). Those are the displayed labels, preserved as written. A supplier appearing there should not be presented as a consumer gambling operator simply because the same group also has consumer businesses.

Markor is a useful bounded example. Its register entry names Markor Technology Limited (t/a Casimba). The linked one-page document uses the fuller text Markor Technology Limited (MTL) t/a Casimba Gaming and identifies B2B Gambling Services RGL No. 152. It prints www.markortech.com and www.casimbagaming.com and says Content as from 10/08/26. Those are supplier-document website references, not a list of consumer casinos authorised to accept players.

Kambi (Gibraltar) Limited appears in B2B remote entry 24 with the category Bookmaker (B2B). The linked Kambi document identifies the same company, prints www.kambi.com and gives B2B Gambling Services RGL No.155, with Content as from 12/08/26. The category wording therefore differs between the index row and its linked document.

Atlas has not decided that one label replaces the other, nor inferred the complete licence scope from either short description. Record both, their source locations and the dates visible on them. Before using this example to decide whether a specific supply arrangement falls within permission, obtain a current clarification or instrument that resolves the activity question.

The links for Wire Action Markets Limited, Tek Fox Limited and Thrilltech (Gibraltar) Limited point to the same UNDER CONSTRUCTION.pdf path in the captured register. The one-page file displays Website Under Construction. It does not identify a holder, website or licence reference. The Thrilltech example is retained in the download with its Software Supplier (B2B) register category and the document gap left visible.

This is a limitation of the linked material inspected, not evidence that the holder has lost its licence. It also does not justify supplying a domain from a search result, logo, group website or older document without marking the separate source and date. Where the document needed for the check is missing, leave that part of the conclusion open.

Casino (Gibraltar) Limited is listed in the B2C Non-Remote Operator section as B2C Non-Remote (Land Based). That row should remain separate from the remote B2C population. A land-based listing does not by itself answer an online-operator or online-domain question.

The five entries under Gambling Operators Support Services carry the label Marketing/Affiliate Services. The download includes Tipico Services Limited as an example of that section. A support-service row is not evidence that the company has a B2C permission, operates a consumer site or shares every permission associated with a similarly named group business.

Define the decision before collecting a row: a holder identity check, a supplier activity check and a consumer-domain check need different evidence. Save the exact question with the source result so a later reviewer can see which part was answered.

The downloadable CSV contains six selected examples and 14 columns. It retains the register section and local row number, the displayed company and category, the inspected document fields and an observation. Not documented means the selected source did not establish that field; it does not mean zero or a negative regulator finding.

Atlas read the complete register, the Government routing page and all three linked PDFs cited below on 11 November 2026. The 10 and 12 August dates belong to the Markor and Kambi documents; 11 November is the inspection date. The register does not provide an individual issue or expiry date in these selected table rows. Neither a fresh retrieval nor a dated document proves the day a licence began, changed or ceased.

The six-row CSV is a bounded research asset. It is not a complete Gibraltar register, a domain allowlist, a legal opinion or a record of every licence condition. The precise Kambi activity scope and the placeholder-document gaps remain unresolved. Atlas will recheck this guide by 18 November 2026, or earlier if a linked document or category changes. Use the current official source when it differs from this dated reading.