Skip to main content
All insights
Market guide10 minute read

Greece legal gambling sites: check a domain with HGC

Check a Greek gambling domain with HGC: provider, affiliate or blacklist result, plus the separate Type 1 betting and Type 2 gaming licence scopes.

Published 7 September 2026 · Updated 7 September 2026
By iGaming Atlas Research Desk4 primary sourcesReview cadence: 30 days
Greece legal gambling sites: check a domain with HGC. 18 licence holders: Check the domain and record type before relying on a claim.
Jump to a section

The short answer

  • The HGC website checker currently presents 18 online licence holders and classifies searched sites as a licensed-provider or affiliate result, a blacklist result, or neither result.
  • A Type 1 licence concerns online betting; Type 2 concerns other online games of chance. They are separate permissions.
  • The blacklist is a negative, domain-level source. Its absence does not prove a site is licensed.
  • Use an exact Greek consumer domain and record the date because provider, affiliate and blacklist records can change.

The HGC checks answer different questions

A useful result names the record type rather than reducing every result to a single word.

HGC result
Licensed provider
What it means
The searched website is associated with an HGC online licence holder
What it does not establish
Every product, country domain or group-company permission
HGC result
Registered affiliate
What it means
The site is identified as an affiliate of a licence holder
What it does not establish
That the affiliate itself is the gambling operator
HGC result
Blacklist
What it means
The exact listed website is in the regulator's unlicensed-provider list
What it does not establish
Ownership beyond the detail HGC publishes
HGC result
No displayed match
What it means
The searched hostname did not return one of those published results
What it does not establish
A general conclusion about legality or another market
HGC result
Type 1 or Type 2
What it means
The applicable online licence category
What it does not establish
Permission in the other category

The HGC checker showed 18 online licence holders when Atlas rechecked it on 7 September 2026. Treat that as a current service display, not a count of brands or websites.

The fastest Greek check starts with the exact website

The Hellenic Gaming Commission runs a public website-legitimacy checker. On 7 September 2026 it displayed 18 online licence holders and invited users to check whether a website belongs to a licensed provider, a registered affiliate or the regulator's blacklist. That makes it more useful than a general brand search.

Enter the full consumer domain a player was given. Do not assume a global homepage, an app link, a local .gr domain and a marketing subdomain have the same record. If a site redirects, keep both hostnames in your note.

Evidence path

From question to defensible conclusion

1

The fastest Greek check starts with the exact website

2

A licensed-provider result is not a blank cheque

3

Affiliate is a different result from operator

4

The blacklist is a separate negative check

Each step must preserve the jurisdiction, product, entity, source and review date.

A licensed-provider result is not a blank cheque

A positive provider result supports the relationship that the checker displays for that website. It is strong evidence for the exact domain, but it should be recorded with the operator name and check date. A similar brand page or another country site still needs its own check.

The result also needs a product reading. Greece's B2C framework has two licence types. Type 1 covers online betting, while Type 2 covers other online games of chance. A reader should not turn one category into a claim about the other.

Affiliate is a different result from operator

The checker can also identify a registered affiliate. That tells a reader that HGC recognises an affiliate relationship for the result shown. It does not make the affiliate the licence holder or prove that it operates the gambling product itself.

This distinction is easy to lose in a search snippet. Keep three fields in the research record: the searched domain, the result type and the licence holder named by the service. That protects the factual chain when a marketing name differs from the underlying company.

The blacklist is a separate negative check

HGC publishes its blacklist of websites used to provide unauthorised gambling services in Greece. The current page says the list includes domains and websites and, where available, legal persons or representatives. It is therefore a domain-led enforcement record, not a substitute for the positive provider check.

A blacklist match is meaningful for the exact entry. It should not be used to guess a corporate owner where HGC has not identified one. The reverse is also true: a domain that is not on the blacklist has not thereby become a licensed provider.

Why familiar brands can still give the wrong answer

International gambling groups commonly use different legal entities, product permissions and consumer domains from one market to another. A Greek-language page, an overseas licence or a well-known logo may explain why a user found the service, but none is the HGC's positive record for Greece.

That is why the checker should lead the process. Search the actual hostname, read the result category, then check the provider and product scope. The evidence remains useful even when the answer is limited.

Evidence summary

4

named primary sources

Last editorial review: 2026-09-07. Review target: every 30 days.

The HGC website checker currently presents 18 online licence holders and classifies searched sites as a licensed-provider or affiliate result, a blacklist result, or neither result.

A Type 1 licence concerns online betting; Type 2 concerns other online games of chance. They are separate permissions.

The blacklist is a negative, domain-level source. Its absence does not prove a site is licensed.

The visual summary does not replace the linked regulator records below.

Use the licence categories carefully

HGC describes Type 1 and Type 2 as distinct B2C online licences under the Greek framework. Type 1 is for online betting. Type 2 is for other online games of chance. A site offering several kinds of games may therefore need evidence that reaches each relevant product category.

Do not fill a gap with a broad phrase such as ‘licensed for casino and betting’ unless the available record supports both. If the checker only supports a domain-to-provider relationship, say that and point the reader to the HGC licensing information for the category question.

How to record a no-match result

When a search returns neither a licensed-provider, affiliate nor blacklist result, record only what the check shows: the exact domain did not produce one of those displayed HGC results on that date. Recheck spelling, www variants and the final redirect destination before stopping.

A no-match is not proof that a service is illegal. It may indicate a domain variant, a changed record or an unresolved corporate relationship. The right response is further evidence, not a stronger accusation.

A short HGC evidence record

For a consumer check, keep the original domain, final domain if redirected, HGC result type, named provider or affiliate, relevant product scope and date. For research work, retain the source page and any displayed legal-entity detail. This is enough to make a later recheck precise.

HGC also directs players to responsible-gambling and complaint routes. Those routes are separate from deciding a licence result, but they are the appropriate next step where a player needs assistance or wants to report a suspicious website.

  • Search the complete hostname, not only the brand name.
  • Distinguish provider, affiliate, blacklist and no-match outcomes.
  • Read Type 1 and Type 2 as separate product categories.
  • Do not use blacklist absence as positive licence evidence.
  • Keep the result limited to Greece and the date checked.
  • Use HGC's official support routes where a player needs help.

Primary sources

These links are maintained by the named authority. Open the current source before relying on a status.