Netherlands gambling licence check: how to use the KSA register
A practical guide to verifying a Dutch online gambling company, website, app and licence number in the official KSA Kansspelwijzer.

Jump to a section
The short answer
- The KSA says the Kansspelwijzer is the authoritative overview of granted Dutch remote-gambling licences; Atlas last reproduced its full online-gambling category on 3 August 2026, when it contained 31 licence-holder records.
- A fresh directory request on 12 October returned an upstream error, so the 31-record snapshot was not relabelled as current; a named operator may instead use a direct current KSA licence decision plus primary identity evidence when the consumer brand differs from the licence holder.
- Users can search the register by company, website, app or licence number; the strongest result matches more than one field.
- A Koa licence is product-specific and should not be confused with a slot-machine approval, lottery licence or supplier relationship.
- An expiring Koa licence cannot be extended: the holder must make a new application, and applications filed from 1 January 2026 require an exit plan.
- The KSA announced eight granted successor licences on 17 September 2026. Seven are covered here and were rechecked on 2 October: their terms took effect on 1 October 2026 and run through 30 September 2031. The preceding terms ended on 30 September 2026.
- On 12 October, Atlas separately rechecked the current individual decisions for JOI Gaming, Tulipa Ent, TonyBet OÜ and SCGO Limited; this bounded review does not replace a complete Kansspelwijzer count.
Fields to preserve in a KSA licence check
The Kansspelwijzer supports several search routes. Preserve the evidence that connects the consumer service to the licence holder.
- Field
- Company
- Question
- Which legal entity holds the Dutch licence?
- Risk avoided
- Confusing a brand or group company with the licence holder
- Field
- Website
- Question
- Is the exact hostname connected to the record?
- Risk avoided
- Applying one licence to another national or cloned domain
- Field
- App
- Question
- Is the consumer app covered by the register result?
- Risk avoided
- Assuming a similarly named app is authorised
- Field
- Licence number
- Question
- Does the identifier match the KSA result?
- Risk avoided
- Relying on a logo without a reproducible record
- Field
- Activity
- Question
- Which online gambling activity is permitted?
- Risk avoided
- Turning a narrow permission into an all-products claim
- Field
- Current status
- Question
- Is the licence still current on the check date?
- Risk avoided
- Relying on a list created before the 2026 renewal cycle
- Field
- Exit plan
- Question
- How will gambling, player balances and required data be closed if the licence ends?
- Risk avoided
- Assuming a pending application automatically keeps the old permission alive
| Field | Question | Risk avoided |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Which legal entity holds the Dutch licence? | Confusing a brand or group company with the licence holder |
| Website | Is the exact hostname connected to the record? | Applying one licence to another national or cloned domain |
| App | Is the consumer app covered by the register result? | Assuming a similarly named app is authorised |
| Licence number | Does the identifier match the KSA result? | Relying on a logo without a reproducible record |
| Activity | Which online gambling activity is permitted? | Turning a narrow permission into an all-products claim |
| Current status | Is the licence still current on the check date? | Relying on a list created before the 2026 renewal cycle |
| Exit plan | How will gambling, player balances and required data be closed if the licence ends? | Assuming a pending application automatically keeps the old permission alive |
Register interfaces and licence records change. The complete 31-record snapshot was reproduced on 3 August 2026; a new directory request still returned an upstream error on 12 October. Record both the evidence date and any access limitation.
The short answer: where to check a Dutch online gambling licence
Use the Kansspelautoriteit's Kansspelwijzer, now served through OpenOverGokken.nl, an initiative of the KSA. The directory lets consumers inspect legal entities and their permitted gambling offer before registering with an operator.
The KSA's online-gambling licence Q&A describes the Kansspelwijzer as the only correct overview of granted remote-gambling licences. The online-gambling category contained 31 records when Atlas successfully queried it on 3 August 2026. A new request on 12 October returned an upstream error, so Atlas retained the dated 31-record snapshot instead of presenting it as a complete current count.
From question to defensible conclusion
The short answer: where to check a Dutch online gambling licence
What a Dutch Koa licence proves
Search the exact website before relying on the brand
Brand and licence holder may have different names
What a Dutch Koa licence proves
A remote-gambling permission is a Koa licence granted under article 31a of the Dutch Gambling Act. The KSA lists four broad remote activities: casino games played against the licence holder, casino games played against other players, sports betting and betting on horse racing or harness racing.
The conclusion must therefore remain tied to the activity and service shown by the current record. A licence holder should not automatically be described as authorised for every online product.
Search the exact website before relying on the brand
Begin with the hostname visible in the browser, without assuming that an international or translated version of a brand is the Dutch service. Search that website in the Kansspelwijzer, then repeat the search using the consumer brand and known legal entity.
A positive company-name result is not enough when the question concerns another domain or app. Preserve the fields that connect the consumer service to the licence record.
Brand and licence holder may have different names
Dutch consumers often know the brand while the KSA record and enforcement notices identify the licensed company. A careful check records both names and explains the relationship rather than silently substituting one for the other.
Corporate ownership can provide useful context, but it does not replace the company, website, app or licence-number match provided by the official register.
The separate Atlas review hold for 888 remains. A KSA supervision notice identifies Godwits Limited as the operator behind 888.nl, but that notice does not establish the current consumer permission, product scope and term. The seven successor decisions do not resolve this separate evidence gap. A review hold is not an illegality finding.
Do not confuse a Koa licence with another approval
The KSA states that a model approval, slot-machine operating permit, lottery permission or exemption does not create a remote-gambling Koa licence. Supplier certification also does not mean the supplier itself holds permission to offer gambling to Dutch consumers.
For an online-operator claim, evidence must point to a Koa licence in a successful Kansspelwijzer result or a direct KSA licence decision. If the consumer brand or domain differs from the licence holder, add current primary evidence that makes that connection. Other approvals should be labelled by their actual purpose.
The successor licences now in force
The first remote-gambling terms ended on 30 September 2026. The KSA requires a new application for a successor licence; an existing permission is not automatically extended.
On 17 September 2026, the KSA announced eight granted successor licences. The seven decisions covered here were rechecked on 2 October and are now in force: TOTO Online (TOTO), Holland Casino, Play North (Kansino), FPO Nederland (Fair Play Casino), Hillside (New Media Malta) (bet365), NSUS Malta (GGPoker) and Betent (BetCity). Each gives an exact term from 1 October 2026 through 30 September 2031.
As of 2 October, the seven successor terms have started and the preceding terms have ended. Keep the old and new decision references separate. A pending application does not establish a successor permission, and another licence with a later start date must still be checked against that date. Product permission and exact consumer-domain evidence remain separate checks. These seven decisions do not establish a fresh complete directory count.
What the new exit-plan requirement changes
Applications submitted from 1 January 2026 must include an exit plan. The document must explain how the operator would end its gambling offer and handle legal, financial, tax, organisational, technical and communications obligations, including prompt payment of player balances and continued access to required control-database records.
The KSA requires notice of an impending exit at least 72 hours before the plan takes effect. The plan does not activate when a new licence application is pending and the holder can reasonably expect approval, but that exception is not a substitute for checking the current licence record and expiry date.
19
named primary sources
Last editorial review: 2026-10-12. Review target: every 30 days.
The KSA says the Kansspelwijzer is the authoritative overview of granted Dutch remote-gambling licences; Atlas last reproduced its full online-gambling category on 3 August 2026, when it contained 31 licence-holder records.
A fresh directory request on 12 October returned an upstream error, so the 31-record snapshot was not relabelled as current; a named operator may instead use a direct current KSA licence decision plus primary identity evidence when the consumer brand differs from the licence holder.
Users can search the register by company, website, app or licence number; the strongest result matches more than one field.
A seven-step KSA verification workflow
Use the same sequence for positive and negative results so another researcher can reproduce the conclusion.
- Copy the exact website hostname or app name being checked.
- Open the live KSA Register of licensees.
- Search the website or app, then the brand and legal company separately.
- Open the matching result and record the licence holder and number.
- Check that the result concerns the relevant remote-gambling activity.
- Confirm that the licence remains current on the check date.
- Publish a Netherlands-specific conclusion with the official URL and limitations.
What absence from the register means
After a successful directory retrieval, if the company, website, app and licence number cannot be matched, do not describe the service as holding a Dutch remote-gambling licence. Record each search term and the date so the negative finding can be repeated.
Check alternative legal and trading names before closing the research. A foreign gambling licence, group-company permission or KSA logo displayed by the site does not replace a current Kansspelwijzer match.
How to handle a temporarily unavailable directory
An access failure is not a licensing result. If the Kansspelwijzer does not load, preserve the last reproducible snapshot as historical evidence and mark the current full-directory check as unavailable. Do not convert a timeout, gateway error or blocked request into a claim that an operator has disappeared from the register.
For a named operator, use the KSA licence decision to establish the holder, licence reference, authorised categories and term. Use a KSA supervision record or first-party legal page to connect a different brand or domain. This source stack can update only the named relationship; it does not refresh the complete directory.
Common mistakes in Dutch licence checks
The main errors come from treating the brand, company, domain, app and licence as interchangeable.
- Searching only the brand and not the exact website or app.
- Assuming a licence held by one group company covers another entity.
- Treating a KSA logo as sufficient proof without opening the register.
- Confusing a supplier, lottery or slot-machine approval with a Koa licence.
- Ignoring the permitted activity or current licence status.
- Using a pre-renewal operator list without a new check.
Four current individual decisions rechecked on 12 October
Atlas separately reopened the current KSA decision pages for JOI Gaming Limited, Tulipa Ent Limited, TonyBet OÜ and SCGO Limited on 12 October 2026. Each decision remains evidence for the named legal entity and published term; it is not a substitute for matching the exact consumer website, app and activity in the Kansspelwijzer.
This is a bounded relationship review, not a full directory recount. The unavailable directory means Atlas does not infer how many other licences are currently granted, and it does not treat a missing directory response as evidence that an operator lacks authorisation.
Review cadence and evidence boundary
Atlas rechecked the seven named successor decisions on 2 October 2026, after their terms began on 1 October, and four additional individual decisions on 12 October. The ordinary 30-day review also comes forward after a KSA licensing decision, expiry, enforcement notice, website change or corporate transfer. The complete 31-record snapshot remains dated 3 August and the last recorded failed directory request is dated 12 October. The next complete count requires a successful Kansspelwijzer retrieval; individual decisions are tracked separately in the meantime.
This guide explains how to verify the official record. It is not legal advice, does not guarantee player outcomes and cannot replace the current Kansspelwijzer entry.
Turn the evidence into a focused research brief
Send the regulatory question, entities and markets you need reviewed. We can scope a private source review with dated evidence and explicit limits.
Markets, outputs, evidence cut-off and fee are agreed in the written scope.
Need structured records for a workflow? Explore CSV and JSON data.
Primary sources
These links are maintained by the named authority. Open the current source before relying on a status.
Register of licensees - access recheck failed 12 October; last complete snapshot 3 August 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 12 October 2026
Online gambling licence questions and answers
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 3 August 2026
Offering online gambling in the Netherlands
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 1 August 2026
Koa application procedure for existing licence holders
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 24 August 2026
Remote gambling licensing policy rules 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 1 August 2026
Exit plan requirements for remote-gambling applications
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 24 August 2026
First successor licences granted - announcement of 17 September 2026 and linked individual decisions
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
TOTO Online successor-licence decision - effective 1 October 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
Holland Casino successor-licence decision - effective 1 October 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
NSUS Malta successor-licence decision - effective 1 October 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
Play North successor-licence decision - effective 1 October 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
Hillside (New Media Malta) successor-licence decision - effective 1 October 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
Betent successor-licence decision - effective 1 October 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
FPO Nederland successor-licence decision - effective 1 October 2026
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026
JOI Gaming Limited remote-gambling licence decision
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 12 October 2026
Tulipa Ent Limited remote-gambling licence decision
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 12 October 2026
TonyBet OÜ remote-gambling licence decision
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 12 October 2026
SCGO Limited remote-gambling licence decision
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 12 October 2026
888.nl supervision notice of 10 November 2025: Godwits identity, not a current term or product-scope record
Kansspelautoriteit · checked 2 October 2026